merseysideskeptics.org.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the merseysideskeptics.org.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host merseysideskeptics.org.uk. Currently, hosted in Singapore and its service provider is CloudFlare Inc. .

the related websites

accaglobal.com moonfruit.com hse.gov.uk maplin.co.uk eurogrand.com posh24.com visitscotland.com ebrd.com netnames.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called cloudflare containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

for science, reason, and critical thinking home skeptics in the pub podcasts privacy policy about contact be reasonable: episode #054 – michael davidson posted by mike in be reasonable , podcast on july 30, 2018 joining marsh this month is michael davidson from the christian “ex-gay therapy” ministry, core issues trust. podcast: download (duration: 56:01 — 25.7mb) no comments skeptics with a k: episode #229 posted by mike in podcast , skeptics with a k on july 26, 2018 new york city, hunting unicorns, tangible goals, and what happened at necss. plus attentive moths, relationship ladders, the impossible burger, and consensual non-monogamy. with love springing forth endlessly from our hearts, it’s skeptics with a k. podcast: download (duration: 1:24:29 — 38.8mb) 4 comments the potato famine diet posted by alice in diet , evolution , nutrition , plants , science , skepticism on july 19, 2018 i’m not a fan of ‘the past’. there’s too much of it quite frankly, most of it is messy and violent, full of bad people with bad ideas and there’s no internet. (yep, sorry folks, i’m one of those dreaded ‘millennials’ that are apparently ruining everything, sorry……..#notsorry) i feel in the minority however, most people these days love the past! they’re obsessed with it. so much so they will stop at nothing to take us back to it! it may surprise you that i am not actually talking about politics (for once). i’m talking about food. more specifically i’m talking about diets. there’s a trend in faddy diets and ‘clean’ eating at the moment that focusses on going ‘back to basics’ , going back to a simpler time and eating like our ancestors did. they obviously make a convincing argument, the whole ‘wellness’, ‘clean eating’ movement are extremely popular and don’t seem to be going anywhere. (dammit). so with that in mind……. looking for a diet that’s based on a famine that killed over 1 million people!? well look no more my friend because i present to you the ‘irish peasant diet’!………seriously. that’s a thing. the irish ‘peasant’ diet i spotted an article on twitter from the irish independent titled ‘is this ireland’s answer to the med diet?’ in which it went on to describe how research had found that a diet from mid-victorian ireland in poor, rural communities made them healthier than their city dwelling counterparts, they were living longer and contracting fewer diseases, and therefore we should adopt a similar diet now. the ‘diet’ consisted of vegetables, milk and fish. sounds pretty healthy right? what’s my issue here? the average life expectancy of a man in ireland during the 1800’s was 40 years old. sanitation was basic, people were starving and healthcare was minimal if there at all. the reality is that ‘peasants’ were eating what was available to them. sure, it was a ‘low-calorie’ diet but when you look at all other lifestyle factors that might not count for much. the article mentions that tuberculosis cases in rural areas were lower compared to cities and attributes that to die. but let’s remember that in victorian city slums, people were living in unsanitary conditions, closely packed together with limited access to clean water and that tends to help diseases, like tuberculosis, spread like wildfire. the article also talks about the benefits ‘peasants’ had due to their ‘low caloric intake’……….aka. starving to death. following the logic of that article i have a few of my own ideas on ‘limiting caloric intake’: how about the 1930’s ‘stalin diet’?, or maybe the 1940’s ‘warsaw ghetto diet’? or if you fancy something a little more up to date why not the 1980’s ‘ethiopia diet’? sound flippant? so does basing a diet on a tragedy that killed over a million people… maybe i’m wrong though, maybe these victorian peasants weren’t starving because they had no food, maybe they were the early pioneers of the ‘keto’ diet ! – the diet based on the idea of putting your body in a state of ketosis to lose weight. it’s unlikely though….unless they were so determined to make their diet work that the death of millions didn’t prompt them to rethink their methods…..anyway, i digress. we are living in a world that has never been more medically and scientifically advanced. life expectancy and our ability to treat and cure disease has never been better and yet people are desperate to go backwards. back to a simpler time, when we didn’t have the big scary gmo’s and nasty (un-defined) chemicals in our food. a simpler time, when disease amongst the poor was rife and living beyond 50 was a significant achievement. the article does what a lot of the ‘it was better in the old days’ types tend to do which is cherry pick ‘evidence’. they select the positives and ignore everything else, presenting a false, rose tinted view which ignores the inequality and suffering of many in favour of pushing an agenda……….still talking about diets. definitely diets……. the article gives the opinions from a few nutritionists, one of which says… “peasants may also have experienced periods of food scarcity. whilst this is clearly not always beneficial and malnutrition would have been a concern, we now understand that limiting caloric intake can trigger biological processes that support health and help prevent disease.” i had to read this quote several times to fully understand the point she was trying to make. food scarcity is ‘not always beneficial’? when is a lack of availability of a basic human resource ever ‘beneficial’ exactly? it’s fine though because we now know that those malnourished peasants were clearly just paving the way for the ‘faddy’ diets of the future right? this take is flippant and condescending. this ‘peasant diet’ is nothing more than fetishizing and trivialising poverty. a symptom of a wider problem? if we move away from the past and take a look at the present this patronising attitude towards poverty is everywhere. although instead of praising the poor on their dietary ‘choices’ we now condemn them. there is a great deal of ignorance when it comes to poverty and the realities of living with austerity. this can be seen clearly in the approach to advising or criticising poor people on their diet. you might see ‘ clean eaters’ , chefs and other middle class ‘foodies’ telling people to stop buying ready meals, cheap takeaways and processed food , or as mr jamie oliver calls it, ‘crap’, and instead get down to our local farmer’s markets at the weekend, buy fresh produce, prepare fresh meals for their families everyday and just live a ‘better, healthier life’. they see these changes as easy and simple, insinuating that a failure to do so is just down to laziness and a lack of self-care. what they fail to understand or even consider is the restrictions that exist on many, when it comes to what food is available to them. much like the ‘peasant diet’, it isn’t about choice. the truth is that, now, in 2018, ‘junk’ food is widely available, it’s convenient and it’s affordable. many families and individuals in this country are living hand to mouth or having to rely on foodbanks (a polite reminder that it is 2018). they can’t afford (whether it is time of money) to get out to a market every weekend. as anthony warner (aka the angry chef) said, “we need to stop mistaking the markers of inequality for the causes of inequality”. don’t get me wrong, i’m sure a lot of people giving advice are well meaning, but they’re not helping. they’re just being patronising. oh, and another thing! seeing as i’m on the subject. what is the obsession with poor people owning tv’s? it is often always a criticism of people on benefits or below the poverty line that they have a tv. the tv always gets a mention. i have 3 issues with this… they’re often always described as being a ‘big’, or ‘massive’ or ‘huge’ flatscreen tv……all tv’s are flatscreen’s these days. it’s just a tv. who cares if they own a tv?! we don’t know the circumstances of how they came to own that tv or how much it cost. that tv is a source of entertainment for tha

URL analysis for merseysideskeptics.org.uk

http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2015/07/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2016/07/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2017/05/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2010/10/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2017/11/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/category/podcast/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2014/06/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/feed/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2014/05/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2012/09/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/category/volunteering/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2012/08/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2011/04/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2013/05/
http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2011/09/
blogs.savethechildren.org.uk
1023.org.uk
independent.co.uk
gmss.uk
badpr.co.uk
merseyskeptics.spreadshirt.co.uk
thetimes.co.uk
mirror.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "merseysideskeptics.org.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 288 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 22:12:40 29-Sep-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS merseysideskeptics.org.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME merseysideskeptics.org.uk

NSERVER

  GAIL.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM 173.245.58.116

  IVAN.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM 173.245.59.120

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .